Wikipedia:Sandbox

The Apollo 11 moon mission is a hoax. The distance to the Moon (363,104,000 m) and the time that the CSML propagated to the Moon (4 days 6 hours and 45 minutes [364,900 seconds]) is used to calculate the average velocity of the CSM,

v = (distance)/(time) = (363,104,000 m)/(364,900 s) = 983 m/s......................................98

The escape velocity of the CSML, from the Earth, is said to be 11 km/s (24,000 mph) which conflicts with the velocity of the CSML that is propagating to the Moon at the average velocity of .983 km/s (2,189 mph) which proves the Apollo 11 mission was fabricated.

....................................................................................................................................

The Apollo 11 mission is a hoax. From the lunar orbital height of approximately 60 miles, the Lander detaches from the CSM, then descends to the lunar surface, the 2,725 kg Moon weight Lander achieves a downward vertical velocity of 2 km/s then the Lander's rocket engine ignites and produces a thrust of 10,000 lb that reduces the Lander's downward velocity. Near the lunar surface, the Lander's thrust is reduced to 3,000 lb which would result in the formation of an enormous amount of rocket smoke reflected by the lunar surface yet the Lunar Lander descent video (video 1) does not depict any rocket smoke reflected by the lunar surface when the Lander approaches the lunar surface. Plus, the photographic images of the Apollo 11 Lander, on the surface of the Moon, do not depict a blast zone beneath the exhaust nozzle of the Lander caused by the final 3,000 lb rocket thrust (fig 36). The 3,000 lb Lander rocket thrust is said to be not significant enough to produce a blast zone but a 3,000 lb rocket thrust would result in a blast zone. Also, the Apollo 11 photographs show boot prints formed by the astronauts walking on the lunar surface but the dry powdery lunar regolith cannot form boot prints that would require moisture.

The Apollo 11 lunar walk were staged. In the video of Armstrong’s first lunar step, the video camera is attached to the side of the Lander and is pointed at the ladder that Armstrong descends (fig 23) but after stepping on the lunar surface Armstrong takes four steps away from the Lander towards the video camera yet the video camera is attached to the side of the Lander. The direction that the Lander's video camera is pointing (fig 2) and Armstrong descending the Lander's ladder and subsequent four step walk towards the camera do not correspond. In addition, the Apollo 11 photographs show an astronaut holding a Hasselblad 500EL camera that is directly exposed to the Sun's intensity (fig 38) but the surface of the Moon is said to have a temperature of 220o F which would inhibit the silver emulsion used on the film. Also, the Apollo 11 photographs (fig 38a,b) depict part of the cross hairs in the back of a lunar object but the cross hairs are etched into a glass plate within the camera which would result in the cross hairs to always be in front of the lunar objects.

The space suit at the internal pressure of 3.7 atmospheres would balloon the arms and legs of the spacesuit and immobilized the astronauts which would prevent the astronauts from walking on the Moon. The internal spacesuit is said to be 3.7 psi

(chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/csm21_spacesuits_pp223-228.pdf)

where the 3,000 si surface area of the spacesuit forms a total force of 3,000 si x 3.7 psi = 11,100 lb (5.5 tons) which would immoblize the astronauts. Plus, in the film of the Apollo 11 astronaut walking on the surface of the Moon shows the placement of the American flag on the surface of the moon but the flag appears to be waving in a vertical direction similar to a nylon flag blowing in the wind (video 2) yet the surface of the Moon has no atmosphere that could form the flag waving motion depicted in the video. Plus, NASA justifies the lunar mission using Moon rocks but the Moon rocks could be volcanic rocks that were found on the Earth, and pass off as Moon rocks.

The Apollo 11 reentry into the Earth's atmosphere violates logic. During the Apollo 11 Command Module (CM), the velocity of the CM is reduced using the Earth's atmosphere. The CM is propagating at the re-entry velocity of 2,400-mph (1 km/s) where the Earth's atmosphere is said to reduce the 2,400-mph horizontal velocity CM to the velocity of 400 mph but at the reentry attitude of 35 miles(fig 1 & 2) is a near vacuum; consequently, it is not physically possible to significantly reduce the CM 2,400-mph reentry velocity at the re-entry height of 35 miles. Plus, the CM's 93-pound (410 N) attitude control thrusters cannot change the horizontal path of the CM by 90o to produce the 400-mph downward vertical trajectory of the CM. Also, drogue chutes when deployed from the 3,000 lb CM propagating at the velocity of 400 mph would be ineffective.

The Apollo 11 Lander's 20 W radio signal cannot produce a detectable radio signal after propagating from the Moon to the Earth since a radio wave loses intensity while propagating. Example, on the Earth, a 1 W cell phone has a maximum range of approximately 8 km, a pirate FM 18 W radio station has a maximum range of approximately 20 km, and a 20 W short wave radio has a range of 6,300 km; consequently, the maximum range of a 20 W radio signal, using the Parkes' large dish radio antenna as the receiving antenna, is approximately 10,000 km yet the distance from the Moon to the Earth is 380,000 km. NASA is assuming that a radio signal does not expand or disperse while propagating from the Moon to the Earth in the vacuum of celestial space but a radio signal experimentally losses intensity while propagating in vacuum.

....................................................................................................................................................................................

The Caltech-MIT lunar laser ranging experiment measures the distance from the Earth to the Moon using a mirrored reflector that was installed on the lunar surface during the Apollo 11 mission. On the Earth, at the LICK observatory, a 2.3 W laser beam is pointed at the Lunar Reflector that is located on the surface of the Moon. The 2.3 W laser light is said to propagate to the Moon and is reflected by the Lunar Reflector where the reflected laser light propagates back to the Earth and is said to be detected by the LICK observatory. Using A/B = cos θ where A is the diameter of an object on the surface of the moon, B is the distance to the Moon and θ is the telescopic resolution that is represented with A/B = θ when A/B → 0. The minimum diameter of an illuminated lunar object that can be resolved by the Lick (.6 arcsec) is calculated,

A = θ x B = [(.6) / 3600] x (3.84 x 108 m) = 64 km.........................................................................102

For the LICK to detect an illuminated object on the surface of the Moon, the object must have a minimum diameter of 64 km (equ 90) yet the Lunar Reflector has the estimated dimensions of 2 ft x 2 ft (fig 40) which nullifies the Caltech-MIT lunar laser ranging experiment.

...............................................................................................

An expanding 2.3 W laser beam cannot form a detectable intensity after propagating to the Moon and back. A 2.3 W laser beam, after propagating a distance of 384,000 km, to the Moon, would disperse and form a beam diameter of approximately 3,218 meters (2 miles) at the Moon. The 2.3 W laser expansion ratio R is derived using the initial 5 mm diameter beam width that expands to the diameter of two miles after propagating to the Moon,

R = d2 / d1 = (3218 m) / (0.005 m) = 643,600............................................................................102

Using the 2.3 W laser expansion ratio R (equ 91), the diameter of a dispersing laser beam after propagating the distance of 477,800 miles (7.6 x 108 m) is calculated,

R x 2 miles = (643,600) x (3,218 m) = 2,071,104,800 m.............................................................104

After a 2.3 W laser beam propagates the distance of 7.6 x 108 m (distant to the Moon and back), a 2.3 W laser beam's diameter expands to over two million kilometers (equ 92) that infinitesimal light intensity cannot be detected by the LICK which further invalidates the MIT-Caltech lunar laser experiment. NASA is assuming that the intensity of a laser beam does not expand during propagation similar the NASA assumption regarding the dispersion of the 20 W radio wave used in the Apollo 11 communication system.